Host:
"The clash we are witnessing around the world is not a clash of religions, or a clash of civilizations. It's a clash between two opposites, between two eras. it is a clash between a mentality that belongs to the Middle Ages, and another mentality that belongs to the 21st century. it is a clash between civilization and backwardness, between the civilized and the primitive, between barbarity and rationality. it is a clash between freedom and oppression, between democracy and dictatorship. It is a clash between human rights, on the one hand, and the violation of those rights on the other hand. It is a clash between those who treat women like beasts, and those who treat them like human beings. What we see today is not a clash of civilization. Civilizations do not clash but compete.
HOST:
"I understand from your words that what is happening today is a clash between culture of the West and the backwardness and ignorance of Muslims?"
GUEST:
"Yes that is what I mean"
HOST:
"Who came with the concept of a clash of civilazation? Was it not Samuel Huntington? It was not Bin Laden. I would like to discuss this issue"
GUEST:
"The Muslims are the ones who begin using this expression. The Muslims are the ones who began the clash of civilizations.
The Prophet of Islam said:
'It was order to fight teh people until they believe in Allah and His Messenger.'
When the Muslims divided the people into Muslims and non-Muslims, and called to fight the others until they believe, they started this clash and began this war.
In order to stop this war, they must re-examine thier Islamic books and curricula, which are full of calls for takfir and fighting the infidels.
My colleague has said that he never offends other people's beliefs. What civilzation on the face
of this earth allows him to call other people by names they did not choose for themselves?
Once he calls them Ahl Al-Dhimma, another time he calls them the "People of the Book'?
and yet another time he compares them to apes and pigs, or he calls the Christians 'those who incur Allah's wrath."
Who told you they are 'People of the Book?' They are not the 'People of the Book', they are the people of many books. All the useful scientific books that you have today are theirs, the fruit of their free and creastive thinking. What gives you the right to call them 'those who incur Allah's wrath? or 'Those who has gone astray'; and then come here and say that your religion commands you to refrain from offending the beliefs of others?
I'm not a Christian, a Muslim or a Jew. I'm a secular human being. I do not believe in supernatural. But i respect others' right to believe in it.
HOST:
"Are you a heretic"?
GUEST:
"You can say whatever you like. I"m a secular human being who does not believe in the supernatural...
HOST:
"If you are a heretic, there is no point in rebuking you, since you have blasphemed against Islam, the Prophet and the Koran...
GUEST:
"Those are personal matters that do not concern you.
Bother, you can believe in stones, as long as you don't throw them at me. You're free to worship whomever you want, but other people's believes are not your concern, whether they believe that the Messiah is God, son of Mary, or that Satan is God, son of Mary. Let people have their beliefs.
The Jews have come from the tragedy (of the Holocaust), and forced the world to respect them with their knowledge, not with their terror, with their work, not crying and yelling. Humanity owes most of the discoveries and science of the 19th and 20th centuries to Jews scientists.
15 Million people, scattered throughout the world, united and won their rights through work and knowledge. We have not seen a single Jew blow himself up in a German restaurant. We have not seen a single Jew destroy a church. We have not seen a single Jew protest by killing people. The Muslims have turned three Budda statues into rubble. We have not seen a single Buddhist burn down a Mosque, kill a muslim, or burn down an embassy. Only the Muslims defend their beliefs by burning down churches, killing people and destroying embassies
This path will not yeild any results. The Muslims must ask themselves what they can do for humankind, before they demand that humankind respects them."
The end!
Will now that I've seen more of it in order to write it down she is pretty hypocritical herself. She was attacking Islam as a religion and adding all muslims in it. She never spoke about other religions' fanatics. Her only attack was Islam. I pretty much know how I feel - it's because of people like her who point figures that we live in a world like todays.
No comments:
Post a Comment